Current:Home > Contact-usTennessee not entitled to Title X funds in abortion rule fight, appeals court rules-VaTradeCoin
Tennessee not entitled to Title X funds in abortion rule fight, appeals court rules
View Date:2025-01-07 13:39:25
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Federal officials do not have to reinstate $7 million in family planning grant funding to the state while a Tennessee lawsuit challenging federal rules regarding abortion counseling remains ongoing, an appeals court ruled this week.
Tennessee lost its bid to force the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to restore its Title X funding while the state challenged the federal Department of Health and Human Services program rules. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in upholding a lower court's ruling, did not agree with Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti's argument that the federal rules infringe on Tennessee's state sovereignty.
In a 2-1 finding, the judicial panel ruled Tennessee cannot use its state laws to "dictate" eligibility requirements for a federal grant.
"And Tennessee was free to voluntarily relinquish the grants for any reason, especially if it determined that the requirements would violate its state laws," the Monday opinion stated. "Instead, Tennessee decided to accept the grant, subject to the 2021 Rule’s counseling and referral requirements."
The Tennessee Attorney General's office has not yet responded to a request for comment.
The federal government last year pulled $7 million in Title X funding, intended for family planning grants for low-income recipients after Tennessee failed to comply with the program requirements to counsel clients on all reproductive health options, including abortion.
Inside the lawsuit
Title X funding cannot be allocated toward an abortion, but the procedure must be presented as a medical option. Tennessee blocked clinics from counseling patients on medical options that aren't legal in the state, which has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the country.
In the lawsuit filed in federal court last year, Skrmetti argued HHS rules about Title X requirements flip-flopped in recent years and that the HHS requirement violates Tennesseans' "First Amendment rights not to engage in speech or conduct that facilitates abortions."
After Tennessee lost the funding last year, Gov. Bill Lee proposed a $7 million budget amendment to make up for the lost funds that had previously gone to the state health department. The legislative funding may have hurt Tennessee's case to restore the federal funding as judges pointed to the available money as evidence Tennessee will not be irreparably harmed if HHS isn't forced to restore its funding stream.
Last August, the federal government crafted a workaround and granted Tennessee's lost funds to the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood and Converge, which distributed them to Tennessee organizations. The funds are earmarked for family planning services for low-income residents and directly bypass the state health department, which previously distributed the grants.
Skrmetti filed the lawsuit against the HHS two months later.
Latest federal funding fight
The family planning funding was the second federal funding fight to erupt in 2023.
In January 2023, Tennessee announced it would cut funding for HIV prevention, detection, and treatment programs that are not affiliated with metro health departments, rejecting more than $4 million in federal HIV prevention funds.
Tennessee said it could make up the lost fund with state dollars but advocates decried the move and its potential impact on vulnerable communities as the state remains an HIV-transmission hotspot. The Commercial Appeal, part of the USA TODAY Network, later confirmed Tennessee gave up funding after it tried and failed to cut out Planned Parenthood from the HIV prevention grant program.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Cowboys owner Jerry Jones responds to CeeDee Lamb's excuse about curtains at AT&T Stadium
- Oscar nomination for ’20 Days in Mariupol’ is a first for the 178-year-old Associated Press
- Are we counting jobs right? We answer your listener questions
- Former 'CBS Sunday Morning' host Charles Osgood dies at 91 following battle with dementia
- A growing and aging population is forcing Texas counties to seek state EMS funding
- Jury selection begins for Oxford school shooter's mother in unprecedented trial
- Singer Chris Young charged for resisting arrest, disorderly conduct amid bar outing
- Hollywood attorney Kevin Morris defends $5 million in loans to Hunter Biden
- Charles Hanover: A Summary of the UK Stock Market in 2023
- North Dakota judge won’t block part of abortion law doctors say puts them at risk of prosecution
Ranking
- 13 Skincare Gifts Under $50 That Are Actually Worth It
- Most United Methodist Church disaffiliations are in the South: Final report outlines latest in ongoing split.
- eBay to lay off 1,000 workers as tech job losses continue in the new year
- Girl, 8, describes 'magical' moment Jason Kelce picked her up to say hi to Taylor Swift
- Disney Store's Black Friday Sale Just Started: Save an Extra 20% When You Shop Early
- Wisconsin Republicans make last-ditch effort to pass new legislative maps
- We break down the 2024 Oscar nominations
- Netflix buys rights to WWE Raw, other shows in live streaming push
Recommendation
-
Bradley Cooper and Gigi Hadid Enjoy a Broadway Date Night and All that Jazz
-
Nebraska lawmaker announces Democratic bid for Congress, says Republicans bend to ‘vocal minority’
-
See the full list of Oscar nominations for 2024 Academy Awards
-
EU officials urge Bosnia to press ahead with reform in order to start accession negotiations
-
Mechanic dies after being 'trapped' under Amazon delivery van at Florida-based center
-
TurboTax maker Intuit barred from advertising ‘free’ tax services without disclosing who’s eligible
-
Former 'CBS Sunday Morning' host Charles Osgood dies at 91 following battle with dementia
-
A divided federal appeals court won’t revive Texas online journalist’s lawsuit over 2017 arrest