Current:Home > Contact-usAn abortion ban enacted in 1864 is under review in the Arizona Supreme Court-VaTradeCoin
An abortion ban enacted in 1864 is under review in the Arizona Supreme Court
View Date:2025-01-07 13:42:09
The Arizona Supreme Court grilled lawyers Tuesday over whether a pre-statehood ban on nearly all abortions has been limited or made moot by other statutes enacted over the past 50 years.
The state’s high court is reviewing a lower-court decision that said doctors couldn’t be charged for performing the procedure in the first 15 weeks of pregnancy because other Arizona laws over the years have allowed them to provide abortions.
The 1864 law, which remains on the books, imposes a near total ban on abortions, providing no exceptions for rape or incest but allowing them if a mother’s life is in danger.
Nearly a year ago, the Arizona Court of Appeals concluded that doctors can’t be prosecuted for performing abortions in the first 15 weeks. But it said people who aren’t doctors would still be subject to prosecution under the old law.
Attorneys representing Dr. Eric Hazelrigg, the medical director of anti-abortion counseling centers in metro Phoenix who appealed the decision, had argued the Court of Appeals incorrectly concluded that the law doesn’t apply to doctors. They are asking the state Supreme Court to lift the lower court’s injunction.
Jacob Warner, an attorney representing Hazelrigg, said Arizona’s 15-week abortion law, which took effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, makes it clear that abortion is only allowed after that time frame to protect the mother’s life “or to prevent significant reversible bodily impairment.”
More on abortion access in America
- The Texas Supreme Court’s rejection of Kate Cox’s request for an exception under the state’s restrictive abortion ban has laid bare the high threshold women in many states must meet to get the procedure.
- Here’s what we know about the legal case of a Kate Cox, a Texas woman denied the right to an immediate abortion.
- In Kentucky, a pregnant woman who filed a lawsuit demanding the right to an abortion has learned her embryo no longer has cardiac activity.
Andrew Gaona, an attorney representing Planned Parenthood Arizona, said that in passing laws regulating abortion over the past 50 years, Arizona lawmakers didn’t “signal any intent that most if not all of these subsequent enactments would become mere empty shells if Roe v. Wade were ever to fall.”
A court had blocked enforcement of the 1864 law shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court issued the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision guaranteeing a constitutional right to an abortion. After the Supreme Court overturned the decision in June 2022, then-Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich succeeded in getting a state judge in Tucson to lift the block. Brnovich’s Democratic successor, Attorney General Kris Mayes, has since urged the state’s high court to reject Hazelrigg’s appeal.
This past summer, abortion rights advocates began a push to ask Arizona voters to create a constitutional right to abortion. If proponents collect enough signatures, Arizona will become the latest state to put the question of reproductive rights directly to voters.
The proposed constitutional amendment would guarantee abortion rights until a fetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks of pregnancy. It also would allow later abortions to save the mother’s life or to protect her physical or mental health.
veryGood! (29173)
Related
- Wisconsin agency issues first round of permits for Enbridge Line 5 reroute around reservation
- Five Americans who have shined for other countries at 2023 World Cup
- Trump mounts defense in Alabama campaign appearance
- Chicago police shoot, critically wound man who opened fire on officers during foot chase
- Olympic champion Lindsey Vonn is ending her retirement at age 40 to make a skiing comeback
- Family of inmate who was eaten alive by bedbugs in Georgia jail reaches settlement with county
- Did anyone win Mega Millions? Winning numbers for Friday's $1.35 billion jackpot
- Bengals' Joe Mixon, sister's boyfriend sued for shooting of teen outside Ohio home
- Wall Street makes wagers on the likely winners and losers in a second Trump term
- Why is Jon Gruden at New Orleans Saints training camp? Head coach Dennis Allen explains
Ranking
- Massive dust storm reduces visibility, causes vehicle pileup on central California highway
- Slain Parkland victim's father speaks out following reenactment
- Even USWNT fans have to admit this World Cup has been a glorious mess
- Chris Christie makes surprise visit to Ukraine, meets with Zelenskyy
- Melissa Gilbert recalls 'painful' final moment with 'Little House' co-star Michael Landon
- On a ‘Toxic Tour’ of Curtis Bay in South Baltimore, Visiting Academics and Activists See a Hidden Part of the City
- Rape charges filed against multiple teenage South Dakota baseball players
- Python hunters are flocking to Florida to catch snakes big enough to eat alligators
Recommendation
-
Karol G addresses backlash to '+57' lyric: 'I still have a lot to learn'
-
Somalia suspends athletics chief after video of slow runner goes viral, amid accusations of nepotism
-
Is mining the deep sea our ticket to green energy?: 5 Things podcast
-
Trump indictment emerges as central GOP concern at Utah special election debate
-
Firefighters make progress, but Southern California wildfire rages on
-
Season-ticket sellout shows Detroit Lions fans are on the hype train
-
California man arrested in break-ins, foot-fondling in Lake Tahoe
-
Oregon, Washington getting Big Ten invitations, according to reports