Current:Home > Contact-usNew Jersey voters may soon decide whether they have a right to a clean environment-VaTradeCoin
New Jersey voters may soon decide whether they have a right to a clean environment
View Date:2025-01-08 16:10:48
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey, known as much for its beaches and blueberries as for the chemical plants and refineries that line some of its major highways, is considering asking voters a fundamental question: Should the state guarantee its citizens the right to a clean environment?
A bill making its way through the state Legislature would put a question on the November general election ballot asking, “Do you approve amending the Constitution to grant every person the right to a clean and healthy environment?”
Environmentalists say the move, known as the “green amendment,” is long overdue and would enable citizens to seek redress in court if they feel their environmental rights are being violated.
But opponents, including business groups, warn that the law could have unintended consequences. They say it could enable foes of one of New Jersey’s main efforts to fight climate change — building offshore wind projects — to challenge and kill the projects in court, saying their right to a clean ocean was being violated.
Three states — Montana, New York and Pennsylvania — have established constitutional rights to a clean environment via similar amendments, but another 15 either are considering such measures or are expected to do so soon, said Maya van Rossum, founder of Green Amendments For The Generations and head of the Delaware Riverkeeper organization in New Jersey.
“We have communities in New Jersey thar are being harmed by air and water pollution despite all these laws we have on the books to protect them,” she said, adding that the proposal, if enacted, would reorient environmental protection toward preventing pollution rather than acting after the fact to address it.
“Right now, governmental officials may think it’s a good idea to protect the environment and may want to do it, but they don’t have a constitutional demand to do it,” she said.
Democratic state Sen. Linda Greenstein, sponsor of the bill, said it would guarantee the fundamental parts of a healthy daily life.
“That means clean water to drink, clean air to breathe and enjoyment of our natural spaces, constitutionally guaranteed to every New Jerseyan today and tomorrow,” she said. “These things should not be considered a privilege afforded to some.”
But the bill does not spell out how the law would work in practice. It designates no entity as the enforcer of the law or the adjudicator of disputes regarding it. That would appear to leave the court system as the main avenue for those who feel aggrieved.
“It would wind up in front of a judge,” Greenstein acknowledged, although she said some preliminary steps including mediation could also be used.
She said lawmakers may need to add language spelling out how the law would work and be enforced.
Ray Cantor, of the New Jersey Business and Industry Association, said the law could have unintended consequences. He said it could enable people who oppose offshore wind power projects to challenge them in court.
“Our concern is many don’t understand the ramifications of this resolution,” he said.
Greenstein and officials with several environmental groups said they do not consider that likely.
The measure would decree that “the state’s natural resources, among them its waters, air, flora, fauna, climate, and public lands, are the common property of all the people, including both present and future generations. The state shall serve as trustee of these resources, and shall conserve and maintain them for the benefit of all people.”
But Bill Wolfe, a former official with the state Department of Environmental Protection and a frequent critic of the agency, said the state already is the trustee of those resources under the Public Trust Doctrine, a legal concept dating back to the Roman Empire that the state has adopted in other areas, including access to beaches and waterways.
“The bill is deeply flawed, and I believe it is more performative than a serious effort,” he said.
Doug O’Malley, of Environment New Jersey, called the bill “the fire axe behind glass that you break in case of emergency.”
“You don’t use it every day, but it’s good to know you have it there in case you need it,” he said.
He and others said they do not expect a flood of litigation as a result of the new law, citing the experiences of other states that have enacted similar provisions.
Several measures have been added to the bill through amendments, including adding “a safe climate” to the list of protected resources, and adding environmental justice concerns to it, according to Democratic Sen. Bob Smith, chairman of the senate committee that advanced the bill on Thursday.
It still requires multiple levels of approval before being placed on the November ballot.
___
Follow Wayne Parry on X, formerly Twitter, at www.twitter.com/WayneParryAC
veryGood! (411)
Related
- Georgia State University is planning a $107M remake of downtown Atlanta
- Nicole Scherzinger receives support from 'The View' hosts after election post controversy
- Tampa Bay Rays' Wander Franco arrested again in Dominican Republic, according to reports
- How many dog breeds are there? A guide to groups recognized in the US
- My Little Pony finally hits the Toy Hall of Fame, alongside Phase 10 and Transformers
- Tua Tagovailoa playing with confidence as Miami Dolphins hope MNF win can spark run
- Wicked's Ethan Slater Shares How Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo Set the Tone on Set
- Volkswagen, Mazda, Honda, BMW, Porsche among 304k vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here
- Cruel Intentions' Brooke Lena Johnson Teases the Biggest Differences Between the Show and the 1999 Film
- Karol G addresses backlash to '+57' lyric: 'I still have a lot to learn'
Ranking
- New Pentagon report on UFOs includes hundreds of new incidents but no evidence of aliens
- Why California takes weeks to count votes, while states like Florida are faster
- Trump has promised to ‘save TikTok’. What happens next is less clear
- Judge set to rule on whether to scrap Trump’s conviction in hush money case
- Tennis Channel suspends reporter after comments on Barbora Krejcikova's appearance
- Cavaliers' Darius Garland rediscovers joy for basketball under new coach
- Sister Wives’ Christine Brown Shares Glimpse Into Honeymoon One Year After Marrying David Woolley
- Congress returns to unfinished business and a new Trump era
Recommendation
-
New York races to revive Manhattan tolls intended to fight traffic before Trump can block them
-
Richard Allen found guilty in the murders of two teens in Delphi, Indiana. What now?
-
Jenn Tran's Ex Devin Strader Throws Shade At Her DWTS Partner Sasha Farber Amid Romance Rumors
-
Benny Blanco Reveals Selena Gomez's Rented Out Botanical Garden for Lavish Date Night
-
Tennessee suspect in dozens of rapes is convicted of producing images of child sex abuse
-
Trump has promised to ‘save TikTok’. What happens next is less clear
-
Kyle Richards Shares an Amazing Bottega Dupe From Amazon Along With Her Favorite Fall Trends
-
Volkswagen, Mazda, Honda, BMW, Porsche among 304k vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here