Current:Home > Contact-usConspiracy theories about FEMA’s Oct. 4 emergency alert test spread online-VaTradeCoin
Conspiracy theories about FEMA’s Oct. 4 emergency alert test spread online
View Date:2025-01-07 14:06:35
CLAIM: An emergency broadcast system test on Oct. 4 will send a signal to cell phones nationwide in order to activate nanoparticles such as graphene oxide that have been introduced into people’s bodies.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Next month’s test of the nationwide Emergency Alert System uses the same familiar audio tone that’s been in use since the 1960s to broadcast warnings across the country. A spokesperson for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which is overseeing the test, also said there are no known adverse health effects from the signal. The claims revive long-debunked conspiracy theories about the contents of the COVID-19 vaccine.
THE FACTS: Social media users are raising dire warnings about upcoming tests of the national emergency warning system.
Many are imploring their followers to shut off their cellphones on the day of the test because they believe it’s part of a broader conspiracy to exert control over the population.
One popular video shows a woman claiming the test will somehow switch on technology that has been introduced into people’s bodies.
“The emergency broadcasting system under FEMA is going to be activated,” the woman explains, speaking directly into the camera. “It’s not a test. It’s going to be sending these high frequency signals into cell phones, radios, TVs. The intention of activating nanoparticles, including graphene oxide.”
In another widely shared video, a man issues a similar warning, adding that graphene oxide and other nanoparticles have been inserted into billions of human beings around the world “through obvious mediums.”
“Everyone will be affected, regardless of status,” he adds in the video, which was widely shared on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, along with the hashtag “CovidVaccine.”
But while FEMA is conducting a routine test of its emergency warning system next month, there is no truth to the claim that it will emit a wireless signal that will somehow activate graphene oxide or nanoparticles in the body.
Stanley Perlman, professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Iowa in Iowa City, said the claims appear to be referring to old myths about the contents of COVID vaccines.
These baseless conspiracy theories claim -- without evidence -- that the vaccines contain various materials, such as graphene oxide or other nanoparticles, that can interact with wireless communications technology. They claim that the materials, when activated, can allow governments to control and monitor people.
But graphene oxide — a material made by oxidizing graphite — isn’t an ingredient in the COVID vaccine, notes Matthew Laurens, a pediatric infectious disease specialist with the Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health at the University of Maryland School of Medicine.
“Graphene oxide is not in the mRNA-based vaccines for COVID-19 manufactured by Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna,” he wrote in an email Monday. “Graphene oxide was used to study vaccine structure only, and is not part of the vaccine formulation.”
Regardless, the notion that graphene oxide can be “activated” in this way is “nonsense,” wrote Julia Greer, a materials science professor at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena who has used graphene oxide in her research, in an email Monday.
“You can’t ‘activate’ graphene oxide,” she wrote. “What does that even mean?”
The actual nanoparticles in the vaccines, meanwhile, are lipids, or fats, that are generally used as a coating material. They’re sometimes described as “programmable” because they can be modified and adjusted, depending on the need, experts have said. It does not mean they can be programmed to interact with wireless networks.
There’s also nothing nefarious about the routine test FEMA and the Federal Communications Commission are conducting next month.
Such tests have been happening with regularity for years now without any reports of adverse health effects from the system signals, said Jeremy Edwards, FEMA’s spokesperson.
“The sole purpose of the test is to ensure that the systems continue to be an effective means of warning the public about emergencies, particularly those on the national level,” he wrote in an email this week.
The two nationwide systems -- the Emergency Alert System, or EAS, and Wireless Emergency Alerts, or WEA -- are “critical tools” that save lives and allow people to protect property when natural disasters, acts of terrorism and other threats to public safety strike, Edwards added.
Next month’s test is slated to begin on Oct. 4 at around 2:20 p.m. eastern time, but could be postponed to Oct. 11 if there’s severe weather or other significant events, according to FEMA.
The process involves two parts: a 30-minute signal sent to radios and televisions as part of EAS, and a similar one sent to all consumer cell phones as part of the WEA system.
According to FEMA, the message to be broadcast will state: “This is a nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System, issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, covering the United States from 14:20 to 14:50 hours ET. This is only a test. No action is required by the public.”
Federal law requires the systems be tested at least once every three years. The last nationwide test was Aug. 11, 2021.
Edwards said the audio signal used for the tests utilizes the same combination of tones familiar to Americans since 1963, when President John F. Kennedy established the original Emergency Broadcast System through an executive order.
It’s also the same tone as those sent by more than 1,700 local, state, territorial and tribal authorities that send similar alerts for more localized emergencies.
___
This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.
veryGood! (31)
Related
- Gerry Faust, former Notre Dame football coach, dies at 89
- Western and Arab officials are gathering in Paris to find ways to provide aid to civilians in Gaza
- Mariska Hargitay Makes Fans Go Wild After She Asks Photographers to Zoom in on Her Necklace
- Long Beach man who stabbed mother with kitchen knife dies after police shooting
- Republican Rep. Juan Ciscomani wins reelection to Arizona US House seat
- Tallulah Willis Shares Why Her Family Has Been So Candid About Dad Bruce Willis' Health
- Former top prosecutor for Baltimore declines to testify at her perjury trial
- Effort to remove Michigan GOP chair builds momentum as infighting and debt plague party
- At age 44, Rich Hill's baseball odyssey continues - now with Team USA
- Woman charged with threatening federal judge in abortion pill case arrested in Florida
Ranking
- 10 Trendy Bags To Bring to All of Your Holiday Plans
- Former NFL Player Matt Ulrich Dead at 41
- When is Aaron Rodgers coming back? Jets QB's injury updates, return timeline for 2023
- So you want to be a Guinness World Records title holder? Here's what you need to know
- Mariah Carey's Amazon Holiday Merch Is All I Want for Christmas—and It's Selling Out Fast!
- Kim Kardashian Proves She's a Rare Gem With Blinding Diamond Look
- Los Angeles coroner’s investigator accused of stealing a crucifix from around the neck of a dead man
- The third Republican debate's biggest highlights: 5 GOP candidates face off in Miami
Recommendation
-
Democrat George Whitesides wins election to US House, beating incumbent Mike Garcia
-
Democrats see abortion wins as a springboard for 2024 as GOP struggles to find a winning message
-
2024 Met Gala Theme Revealed
-
Why Ariana Madix Was Shocked by Intense Vanderpump Rules Season 11 Teaser at BravoCon
-
2 dead in explosion at Kentucky factory that also damaged surrounding neighborhood
-
Democrat wins special South Carolina Senate election and will be youngest senator
-
Effort to remove Michigan GOP chair builds momentum as infighting and debt plague party
-
Voters in Ohio backed a measure protecting abortion rights. Here’s how Republicans helped